FROM RMN http://www.rumormillnews.com

Aids Depop-The Birthplace Of AIDS & The Kaposi's Sarcoma Epidemic-The Virus Cancer Program 1964-1980

Either all, or nearly all of the AIDS virus, on this planet,
can be traced back to the United Nations administered Small Pox vaccine.
If you make a graph of the number of cases of aids per year,
that graph does not regress back gradually to one case.
It regresses back to thousands of infections, starting at the time of the United Nations administered Small Pox vaccine, in Africa.

It is also significant that The United Nations had published a plan to reduce the world's population.

The origin of The AIDS virus, also appears to be a United Nations
supervised facility, at the army's biowarfare lab at Fort Detrick, Maryland.

Biowarfare is ALWAYS supervised by the United Nations;
by way of a treaty (United Nations Convention).

There are two such labs in the world:
Fort Detrick, Maryland and Sverdlosk, Russia.
Both are staffed by the same people,
and both are supervised by the United Nations.

AIDS was not originally transferred to man via a monkey in Africa
That was the original theory, which has been discredited.

The DNA CODON SEQUENCE of the "AIDS like" virus in the green monkey
is not similar to The DNA CODON SEQUENCE of "AIDS" virus in humans.

The DNA CODON SEQUENCE "AIDS" virus in humans is 50% similar to
sheep Visna, and 50% similar to Bovine Leukemia.
This indicates that the most probable origin of AIDS was a
recombinant synthesis between to sheep Visna nd Bovine Leukemia.
This part could have been done by accident. It would only involve
mixing sheep Visna infected plasma with Bovine Leukemia infected
plasma. Of course this is ALSO an interspecies cross up.

HERE IS THE PROBLEM;

Recombinant synthesis usually produces nothing else
except "incompetents"
(Virus that cannot live, cannot reproduce, or cannot live anywhere
ELSE except where they were formed)

The next step could not have been an accident.
It is called REPLICATE PASSAGE.

This involves gradually changing the medium of an "incompetent";
which cannot live anywhere ELSE except where they were formed.
In this way the virus in adapted to live in a new species.
Thus an incompetent virus that originated from interspecies cross up
involving sheep and cows, can be made capable of living in Humans.

http://www.konformist.com/1999/aids/manmade.txt

William Campbell Douglas, M.D., National Health Federation's 1985
Doctor of the Year, published AIDS:The End of Civilization, 1989, detailing the
development of HIV by scientists working at the army's biowarfare
lab at Fort Detrick, Maryland.

John Seale, M.D. concludes AIDS was man-made in "Origins of the
AIDS Viruses, HIV-1 and HIV-2: Fact or Fiction?" (The British Journal of
the Royal Society of Medicine 81:617-619, 1988) .

Lieutenant Colonel Thomas E. Bearden (U.S. Army, retired) published
AIDS Biological Warfare in 1988 which maintains that HIV was developed in
American biowarfare labs. Bearden holds a Master of Science degree in
nuclear engineering and a Bachelor of Science degree in mathematics,
and heads an aerospace firm in Georgia.

Dr. Leonard Horowitz, DMD, MA, MPH, a Harvard graduate, published
Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola -- Nature, Accident or Genocide in 1996.
OutpostS Book Review calls it: "The most massive, well-documented assembly of
evidence ever published in support of the idea that the AIDS virus
could have been manufactured as a biological weapon... If you scoff at the
notion, you won't be so cocky once you see how much evidence exists."

Washington State Supreme Court Justice William Goodloe (retired)
wrote a letter in 1990 supporting published articles by award-winning
journalist, Peter MacKenzie: "I have heard and seen reports of the possible
artificial origin of the AIDS virus, but until this report have not seen such
compelling evidence of its truth. Mr. MacKenzie has assembled a
remarkable documentation of heretofore unpublished data, and an immediate
governmental investigation at the highest level should be commenced."

Samuel Evans, Chairman of the National Council of Public Auditors,
sent the following letter to every member of Congress in 1989:

"I address this letter to you requesting a Congressional
investigation into the 'allegations' that our government is financing research and
development through genetic heredity engineering to multiply certain viruses to
kill specific racial groups...The multitude of allegations, statements,
news articles and personal testimony demands prompt clarification. For
instance, it is alleged:

1. That Col. David L. Huxsoll, commander of the U.S. Army Research
Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Md., has received
$60 million for research in biological ethnic weapons.

2. That it might be possible to wage ethnic warfare by developing
substances that affect one race more than another. According to
Newsweek magazine, Jan. 16, 1989, an example would include 'Valley fever,
which is much more likely to kill blacks than whites.' Another substance,
developed at a southern California university, is believed to kill only people
with melanin in their skin.

3. That it is a coincidence that Fort Detrick, which is where Col.
Huxsoll's biological research is being conducted, is also the site
of AIDS research....

These allegations go to the very root of our constitutional form
of government and basic world human rights, and must be responded to by
elected governmental officials on all levels. Nothing less than a
Congressional hearing and investigation that may lead to a full world conference
in the United Nations is needed to clarify and defuse the alleged mentally
deranged plan of world depopulation by ethnic weapons." (Published in the
Executive Intelligence Review, 3/17/89)

The Report of the President's Chemical Warfare Commission
admits, "The rapid advances of genetic technology -- in which the US for now is
fortunately the leader -- offer the predictable likelihood of new
agents being developed for which no vaccines or counteragents are known or
available." (Govt. Printing Office, 1985)

Erwin Chargaff, Professor Emeritus of Columbia University and
recipient of the National Medal of Science for his work with DNA, warned of such
research: "I should say that the spreading of experimental cancer
may be confidently expected." (New York Times Magazine, 8/22/76)

The Foundation for Economic Trends, in a 1987 lawsuit, forced the
Department of Defense to divulge its operation of 127 chemical and
biological warfare research sites in the U.S., including
universities and corporations, as reported by Science Magazine (2/27/87).

http://www.oakvillegreen.com/food_safety.htm

Aids and Green Monkeys

In his earth-shaking book, "AIDS: The End of Civilization", Dr.
William Campbell Douglass asked, "Do you really think some green
monkey all of a sudden bit some guy in the ass and presto, AIDS all
over the world?"

Dr. Douglass was examining the hype that the Centers for Disease
Control in Atlanta have been peddling to the public about the AIDS
virus, HIV. Douglas's book tells the "whole" story of the
development of HIV at the Ft. Detrick(Maryland) military
installation. His story is well documented and confirms the theme of
the futuristic movie "Outbreak".

The Strecker memorandum - aids is man made

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/09/24/aids_made_in_america_journal_of_degenerative_diseases.htm

AIDS 'Made In America' - Journal of Degenerative Diseases

AIDS is a US government operation directed towards population control,
which springs from secret research into disease causing agents
conducted in government biowar laboratories. That is the view of
Donald W. Scott, M.A., M.Sc. of the Common Cause Medical Research
Foundation, a group in Canada which publishes the Journal of
Degenerative Diseases. In a special edition made available for
download here by Progressive Convergence,

http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/Aids-made-in-America-Jourv5n3.pdf

the 36-page journal attempts to make a murky chapter in recent medical history more clearly understandable - up to a point. Scott has delved deeply into the paper trail left by what seems to be a government funded effort to develop disabling diseases and to find ways to transmit these to a target population, time coincident with the appearance of "AIDS" on the world
scene.

We learn about Thomas Merigan, who wrote in 1971 about "Viral
infections in man associated with acquired immunological deficiency
states", about Robert Huebner's research for the US Navy into
spontaneously degenerating adenoid tissue aggravating respiratory
disease in submarine crew, as well as Bjorn Sigurdsson's Rockefeller
sponsored research into brucella bacteria causing visna (danish for
wasting) sheep disease. Hilary Koprowski developed and tested a polio
vaccine and "lost his records". Belgian and Portuguese research that
completed what US scientists were finding and a small pox eradication
campaign that may have been the vehicle for a disease causing agent to
get to Africa. Henry Kissinger figures prominently and Robert Gallo is
of course a king pin, linking the Nixon "war on cancer" research
program with the eventual appearance of AIDS.

I cannot possibly do the work of Scott justice just naming a few of
the highlights. His account makes very interesting reading and it
appears that a book is in preparation that will lay our the story in
all its gory detail.

That there was indeed a US Special Virus program is confirmed by Boyd
Graves, who has been researching the matter independently. His
timeline of the development of a disabling disease agent that he says
became AIDS is available here,

http://www.boydgraves.com/timeline/

while his flow chart
http://www.boydgraves.com/flowchart/download.html

and other publications can be had for a fee.

- - -

What really causes Aids?

Whether AIDS is indeed caused by a virus coming out of a government
program, that is, whether the program was successful and is now in
full swing, or whether it is - as Jonathan Campbell says - the result
of an accidentally "escaped" bioweaponized swine fever virus is
immaterial for now. It might be neither of these two. I still have
some doubts, not about the existence of the program, but about the
mechanism that makes people ill. I have challenged Graves saying that
yes, there may have been a government effort to develop such a virus,
but what about the abundant data that shows

- HIV was never properly isolated

- HIV is not present in sufficient numbers in the blood of
'infected' victims to explain the damage done

- there is no proper test to unequivocally prove infection with HIV

- AZT and other anti-retroviral drugs are highly toxic killing the
patient rather than the virus

- those of the 'infected' that keep away from drugs and strengthen
their own immune system by proper nutrition and other natural
intervention seem to survive and indeed rarely if ever progress to
those 'opportunistic' diseases that make up AIDS.

All those things would seem to indicate that quite possibly, HIV may
have nothing to do with what's called the clinical picture of AIDS and
that most of the damage could actually be done by the cure that is so
ardently advocated by one and all - that cure which is not a cure at
all, but it is the only accepted way of medical intervention. Peter
Barry Chowka put this quite succinctly in a recent article, when he said:

http://members.aol.com/pbchowka/live8hiv-aids070105.html

"Incredibly, the conventional war on AIDS, like no other issue in
history, has succeeded in uniting left and right, liberals and
conservatives, and evangelicals and nonbelievers in a lock-step march
toward institutionalizing the pharmaceutical drug treatment paradigm
worldwide right down to every last person on earth. If this sounds
like an exaggeration, consider the fact that the expressed objective
of policymaking HIV/AIDS control proponents is to test everyone on the
planet for HIV and treat everyone who tests HIV positive with
antiretroviral drugs, even infants who test HIV negative if their
mothers test positive. It is an absolute act of modern heresy and
guaranteed career suicide for anyone in any position of power and
authority to challenge the dominant HIV/AIDS mega-spin including the
belief in the monolithic HIV/AIDS-test-and-treat-with-drug strategy
that is now completely operant at every level of public policy around
the world."

Genocide or accident?

Are we looking at viral genocide? a viral accident? pharmaceutical
genocide? medical incompetence? population reduction in action? We
just can't know with certainty with the data available to us so far.
So by all means therefore, let researchers dig into the murky history
of what seems to have been a government program with destructive intent.

One useful thing to do would be to find out whether there is any truth
to the viral causation of Aids and what particle may be the culprit.
Is it the mycoplasma, the visna virus, is it the Gallo/Montagnier HIV,
or a combination? More importantly, what is the mechanism by which
that viral agent or that particular combination causes the
destruction. In that sense, it would be immensely useful to know what
went on behind closed doors in the US biolabs for at least a decade
and a half before the sudden emergence of AIDS.

But in the meantime, are we to let thousands upon thousands die from
no treatment or wrong treatment? I don't think so. We should
concentrate on cures that work without causing further degradation of
the patient's immune system. Whether it be selenium and other
nutrients as advocated by Harold Foster,

http://www.hdfoster.com/
a silver colloid patented in the US as a possible cure for AIDS and advocated by Graves, a
multivitamin,
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/07/01/harvard_research_in_tanzania_confirms_multivitamin_slows_aids_progression.htm
or simply bettering the standard of living and the diet of people in Africa and indeed around the world, it does not matter.

Let's just get going with something we know works, and let's not
poison the patient in the meantime, please.

But resolve it we must, the riddle of AIDS, if only to prevent the
next hyped up epidemic.

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/03/02/bird_flu_sars_biowarfare_or_a_pandemic_of_propaganda.htm

Here again the link to the special issue:

http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/Aids-made-in-America-Jourv5n3.pdf

AIDS Made in America - Journal of Degenerative Diseases

The recent release by Progressive Convergence:

http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/press-AIDS-made-in-America.htm

Progressive Convergence release - Whistleblowing: AIDS, Made in America

and Harold Foster's book suggesting a nutritional protocol for AIDS
patients:

What really causes AIDS - Harold Foster
http://www.hdfoster.com/index.html#Publications

As I mentioned Jonathan Campbell's hypothesis of AIDS causation, here
a discussion of it from a recent email:

Accidental release of swine fever virus? - Jonathan Campbell

I came at the AIDS puzzle from a completely different angle. When I
first started doing research on AIDS, I was fascinated and horrified
with the fact that it seemed to appear first on Haiti and then spread
to San Francisco and New York. A doctor treating two of the first AIDS
patients - two Haitian immigrants in Boston - Dr. Joseph Viera,
suggested that the disease had been carried to SF and NYC by gay men
traveling to Haiti, since it was a popular vacation spot. He had no
idea why it was in Haiti in the first place. Then when I was in NYC
for a protest demonstration in the early 80s I found a flyer that
claimed that African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) had been cultured in
Haiti in the late 60s and early 70s for use in biological war against
Cuba. ASFV kills pigs by wrecking their immune systems. This was
substantiated by an article several years later, citing that the US
had sent the National Guard to Haiti to exterminate the native wild
pig population of Haiti because it was infested with ASFV. There were
other articles as well: research by Drs. Jane Teas and John Beldekas
that they had discovered ASFV infection in men who had AIDS, clusters
of AIDS and ASFV in Belle Glade, Florida where Haitian immigrants had
smuggled pigs from the island, and prevalence of ASFV in Zaire among
pigs where the epidemic of AIDS seemed to be centered at the time in
Africa.

There was a missing link, however. Where on earth did Gallo's new
retrovirus, HIV, come from, and why did it seem to be prevalent among
men who had AIDS? It seemed to be similar to a retrovirus prevalent in
green monkeys. Then I read that there had been a big controversy about
the use of chimpanzees in research, as they were an endangered
species. Green monkeys, which were plentiful and not facing
extinction, became the choice for animal experiments and, as it turned
out, green monkey kidney became the popular growth medium for virus
research. BINGO. The green monkey retrovirus was obviously used as the
culture medium for the CIA's ASFV biowarfare agent, adding green
monkey retrovirus into the mix. This mixture was undoubtedly tried out
on wild Haitian pigs to see if it worked, and one or more of them
probably escaped. Or the CIA released them purposely to see what would
happen, since Haiti was considered expendable.

The rest is history. Either through ingestion or blood ritual, Haitian
people became the first victims (in the Western Hemisphere, that is).
I stated above many of the other connections as well, supporting this
historical origin. Gallo's new virus, HIV, possibly a mutant of the
green monkey retrovirus, was found to be prevalent in AIDS patients
and declared to be the cause of AIDS, but prevalence does not mean
virulence or causation. The emerging AIDS establishment at the CDC,
led by Gallo, had to come up with weird explanations of how a weak,
lame retrovirus could possible cause disease years later. In 1986,
faced with the possibility that researchers were going to develop an
alternative origin model, Gallo and his following met at Cold Spring
Harbor and *declared* that no funding was to be given to anyone
working on a non-HIV causation of AIDS, and these alternative
researchers were essentially drummed out. AZT, a failed cancer drug,
was tested in a fraudulent manner in Boston, and wild claims of its
efficacy provided the backdrop for the declaration that it was the
first-line defense against HIV, now very firmly entrenched as the
"cause" of AIDS.

If what I have stated above is true, what we have is the
possibility that AIDS is the unintended result of biological warfare.
The vast majority of alternative AIDS researchers such as Duesberg -
those who understand that HIV cannot be the cause of AIDS - believe
that AIDS does not have a special viral cause at all. Their claim -
and they have lots of good evidence - is that in the US it is caused
by toxic trauma and/or malnutrition, and that in developing countries
it is just a convenient label given to people who are dying of mundane
causes - malnutrition, typhoid, TB, - all of the ordinary, known
diseases of poverty.

---------------------------------------------------

The Virus Cancer Program 1964-1980
The Birthplace Of AIDS And The Kaposi's Sarcoma Epidemic

'Two new viral epidemics erupting exclusively in homosexuals is an unprecedented event in medical science. Such a bizarre and unlikely scenario strongly suggests to me that that the two epidemics of HIV and KS are more likely to have occurred due to the deliberate or accidental "introduction" of new viruses into gay men"-and not from two viruses suddenly appearing "out of Africa."'

The Virus Cancer Program
1964-1980
The Birthplace Of AIDS And The Kaposi's Sarcoma Epidemic

By Alan Cantwell, MD

(c) 2005 All Rights Reserved
9-27-5